<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Oscar 2007: Best Foreign Language Semi-Finalists</title> <atom:link href="http://www.altfg.com/blog/awards/2007-oscar-foreign-language-film-contenders/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.altfg.com/blog/awards/2007-oscar-foreign-language-film-contenders/</link> <description>The Oscars, film awards, new releases, Los Angeles screenings, movie classics, gay movies, film festivals, box office, foreign and independent films</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 05:29:46 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Josefa</title><link>http://www.altfg.com/blog/awards/2007-oscar-foreign-language-film-contenders/#comment-322188</link> <dc:creator>Josefa</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 16:02:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.altfg.com/blog/archives/2007/01/16/oscars-foreign-language-film-potential-contenders-2nd-round/#comment-322188</guid> <description>I loved Avenue Montaigne. I can&#039;t believe that it didn&#039;t get a nomination. Volver was also excellent. One of the best Almodovar films, with all-around great performances.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved Avenue Montaigne. I can't believe that it didn't get a nomination. Volver was also excellent. One of the best Almodovar films, with all-around great performances.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: jalal khoban</title><link>http://www.altfg.com/blog/awards/2007-oscar-foreign-language-film-contenders/#comment-119027</link> <dc:creator>jalal khoban</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 21:04:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.altfg.com/blog/archives/2007/01/16/oscars-foreign-language-film-potential-contenders-2nd-round/#comment-119027</guid> <description>hi i love send me that the after brylluppet film with my email thanks for you</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi i love send me that the after brylluppet film with my email thanks for you</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Andre Soares</title><link>http://www.altfg.com/blog/awards/2007-oscar-foreign-language-film-contenders/#comment-109846</link> <dc:creator>Andre Soares</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 23:46:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.altfg.com/blog/archives/2007/01/16/oscars-foreign-language-film-potential-contenders-2nd-round/#comment-109846</guid> <description>I&#039;m not sure whether that&#039;s good or bad either -- it&#039;s probably neither. An Oscar nod, at times, does help a film with no distribution to find a U.S. outlet, but sometimes even that isn&#039;t enough.
Now, I found surprising -- and a tad upsetting -- was that &quot;Volver&quot; didn&#039;t get a best foreign-language film nomination. I assume this happened because of the Academy changes in the foreign-language film voting process this year.
About 15 or so members in New York and Los Angeles decided which five films (out of nine semi-finalists) should get the nominations. An unfortunate decision, in my view.
When you have a larger group of voters, personal prejudices (whether in favor of or against a particular director, performer, etc.) carry less weight in the final outcome.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm not sure whether that's good or bad either &#8212; it's probably neither. An Oscar nod, at times, does help a film with no distribution to find a U.S. outlet, but sometimes even that isn't enough.</p><p>Now, I found surprising &#8212; and a tad upsetting &#8212; was that "Volver" didn't get a best foreign-language film nomination. I assume this happened because of the Academy changes in the foreign-language film voting process this year.</p><p>About 15 or so members in New York and Los Angeles decided which five films (out of nine semi-finalists) should get the nominations. An unfortunate decision, in my view.</p><p>When you have a larger group of voters, personal prejudices (whether in favor of or against a particular director, performer, etc.) carry less weight in the final outcome.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Boyd</title><link>http://www.altfg.com/blog/awards/2007-oscar-foreign-language-film-contenders/#comment-108893</link> <dc:creator>Boyd</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 10:33:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.altfg.com/blog/archives/2007/01/16/oscars-foreign-language-film-potential-contenders-2nd-round/#comment-108893</guid> <description>I think the most interesting thing about this group of nominees is that all nine already have a US distributor. When was the last time that interested US cinephiles (who, admittedly, must live in a big city) could end up seeing all the nominees theatrically either before or after the Oscar telecast? I don&#039;t think that has ever happened before. Not sure whether it is a good thing.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the most interesting thing about this group of nominees is that all nine already have a US distributor. When was the last time that interested US cinephiles (who, admittedly, must live in a big city) could end up seeing all the nominees theatrically either before or after the Oscar telecast? I don't think that has ever happened before. Not sure whether it is a good thing.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
