CONTACT/TERMS OF USE            HELP WANTED

$10 Billion at the Box Office: When a Record Isn’t Really a Record




Stephen Lang, Sam Worthington in Avatar
Stephen Lang, Sam Worthington in Avatar (Mark Fellman / 20th Century Fox)

Earlier this week, it was announced with much fanfare that despite the painful economic times the movie business is having a record year, with more than $10 billion earned at the US/Canada box office in 2009. Among the year's biggest hits were Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen, Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince, The Twilight Saga: New Moon, and Up. Additionally, hits such as The Blind Side and Avatar will have much of their income tallied only next year, and — if they're successful — the same will happen with It's Complicated, Sherlock Holmes, Nine, Up in the Air, and The Lovely Bones.

Now, although $10 billion is an impressive figure for most industries (definitely not for military contractors), it's a box-office record only because ticket prices keep going up nearly every year. In fact, Hollywood could break box-office records annually if ticket prices were hiked up a certain percentage each year so as to offset any expected drop (or lack of increase) in ticket sales.

Hollywood.com estimates that in 2009 ticket sales will grow by 9 percent over 2008 (which had a 4.5 percent drop from the previous year), with a 5 percent rise in the actual number of tickets sold. Yet, according to the New York Times, "when adjusted for inflation, 2002 had sales of $11.21 billion, while the totals for 2001, 2003 and 2004 also exceed this year’s tally."

Putting things in perspective: according to Box Office Mojo, 1,403 billion tickets have been sold in 2009, while in 2002 that figure reached 1,575 billion. The box-office record-breaking looks considerably less smashing that way, doesn't it? (Outside the US and Canada, ticket sales have grossed $15 billion, up about 5 percent from 2008, though that figure can be partly explained by the dollar's dramatic fall in a number of key film markets.)

Putting things in even better perspective: In 1947, an estimated 90 million people went to the movies every week in the United States (population: 144 million). That meant approximately 4,680 billion tickets sold even without state-of-the-art special effects, multiplexes, megabudgeted sequels, Harry Potter, The Lord of the Rings, or Robert Pattinson and Kristen Stewart.

John Garfield, Gregory Peck in Gentleman's Agreement

The top movies of 1947? (Above, John Garfield and Gregory Peck in Gentleman's Agreement.)

All were big-studio star vehicles. Few boasted special effects (Green Dolphin Street has a major earthquake), but those movies offered lots of character, some adventure, plenty of romance, and quite a bit of drama, music, and comedy. It was a different audience then; also, TV was just beginning, and there was no digital cable, DVD, pay-per-view, or online XXX flicks and chatrooms to keep people away from movie houses.

Below is the list of the top 20 films of 1947, via boxofficereport.com:



Continue Reading: Christmas Box Office: SHERLOCK HOLMES Beats AVATAR

Previous Post: Metro Manila Film Festival 2009

SEVEN SAMURAI Review d: Akira Kurosawa
THE LETTER Review – Bette Davis, Herbert Marshall, James Stephenson d: William Wyler
Joan Crawford Q&A with Neil Maciejewski
Ramon Novarro III: Anita Page, Murder, Life As a Gay Man
James Cameron's AVATAR: SPECIAL EDITION Disappoints: Box Office
Steve James/THE INTERRUPTERS, Frederick Wiseman/Censored Classic TITICUT FOLLIES: Cinema Eye Honors


Text © 2004-2011 Alt Film Guide and/or author(s). Not to be reproduced without prior written consent.


4 Comments to $10 Billion at the Box Office: When a Record Isn't Really a Record

  1. Alex
    December 26, 2009 | Permalink

    I left Piracy at the back for a reason, it is huge but not as game-changing as people make it out. The other factors are a lot more important and you have to agree with me on that one. People still watch movies as much as they did, it's just that they have more ways of doing that now.

    And about your piracy questions. Those numbers are very exact since a tracker (sort of a bridge between servers and people downloading a and uploading stuff like movies, music or games) keeps track of the exact number of people that have downloaded a certain file. When it comes to the quality of the movie they vary depending on how soon they are released. They range from cams to Blue-Ray rips in full 1080p glory. And I'm pretty sure it's impossible to keep track of every single tracker that is offering this stuff so 11 million could very well be 20 million since that site that reported 11 can only keep track of so many torrent trackers.

    So piracy is not something to ignore mate.

  2. Domo
    December 26, 2009 | Permalink

    But piracy is on the rise too

  3. Alex
    December 26, 2009 | Permalink

    I'm so but this article is very much flawed by comparing a year like 1947 when to only option to see a movie or anything for that matter was going to a theater.

    Now we have every single movie that comes out in theaters at home in 6 months or less, either on DVD/Blue-Ray, pay per view or stuff like HBO. And did I mention piracy? Star Trek alone is said to have been downloaded from the internet more then 11 million times. That's almost 100 million in ticket sells right there, not to mention that a movie that you download can be seen by 2,3,4 or 10 people. So while the movie was downloaded 11 million times, more then 100 million people might have seen it, all of that without paying anything else but their Internet connection.

    People like and watch movies just as much (if not more) then they did 62 years ago, it's just that today we have a lot more ways to do it.

Leave a Comment

All comments are moderated and may take some time before they are posted. Comments are welcome on posts old and new. Note: Different views and opinions are perfectly fine, but courtesy is imperative. Abusive/bigoted comments and/or remarks will be deleted, and abusive commenters may be banned.

Also, please note that Alt Film Guide has no contact information for the talent mentioned in this blog and no information pertaining to or access to distributors'/producers' film prints.

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.

Loading

SUBSCRIBE / RSS




Most Popular Tags
2008 Oscar 2010 Oscar 2011 Oscar 2012 Oscar Academy Awards Alexander Payne Alice in Wonderland animation Avatar Bella Swan Berlin Film Festival best films Bill Condon Black Swan box office Brad Pitt Breaking Dawn Part 1 Cannes Film Festival Carey Mulligan censorship Christian Bale Christopher Nolan Christoph Waltz classic movies Clint Eastwood Colin Firth Daniel Radcliffe David Fincher David Slade documentaries Eclipse Edward Cullen film reviews gay film festivals gay interest gay movies George Clooney Golden Globes Golden Globes 2010 Golden Globes 2012 Golden Globes 2012 photos Golden Globes photos Heath Ledger Helen Mirren How to Train Your Dragon Inception Inglourious Basterds James Cameron Javier Bardem Jeff Bridges Johnny Depp Kate Winslet Kathryn Bigelow Kristen Stewart Leonardo DiCaprio lesbian interest Los Angeles Screenings / Film Events Martin Scorsese Matt Damon Meryl Streep Michael Fassbender Michelle Williams Mo'Nique movie awards movie awards 2010 movie awards 2011 Natalie Portman New Moon New York Screenings / Film Events Oscar 2011 photos Oscar ceremony 2011 Oscar movies Oscar Predictions Penélope Cruz political movies Reese Witherspoon Remember Me Robert Downey Jr Robert Pattinson SAG Awards Sam Worthington Sandra Bullock Sex in Movies silent films Spirit Awards Steven Spielberg Summer Under the Stars Sundance Film Festival Taylor Lautner The Artist The Descendants The Hurt Locker The King's Speech The Social Network Tim Burton Toy Story 3 Turner Classic Movies Up in the Air Water for Elephants Woody Allen