<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: REDBELT d: David Mamet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.altfg.com/blog/film-reviews/redbelt-david-mamet-chiwetel-ejiofor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.altfg.com/blog/film-reviews/redbelt-david-mamet-chiwetel-ejiofor/</link>
	<description>thinking film</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:41:03 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Uplift</title>
		<link>http://www.altfg.com/blog/film-reviews/redbelt-david-mamet-chiwetel-ejiofor/#comment-402587</link>
		<dc:creator>Uplift</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 18:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.altfg.com/blog/?p=2736#comment-402587</guid>
		<description>Keith - this is quite a long time after you wrote the post, but I hope you&#039;ll respond.

--&gt; &quot;with only a few tiny oversights&quot; &lt;--

Really?  I mean it - I&#039;m not trolling here.  Here are the two main oversights that are really not tiny.

(1) The idea that the cop could have arrested Emily Mortimer for &quot;attempted murder&quot; - that&#039;s just idiotic. First, as a cop he left a loaded gun out on a countertop - you think he&#039;s not getting in trouble if he reports that? YOu think he doesn&#039;t risk a suspension?  Second, it was obvious to everyone - including Ejiofor&#039;s character, who was not about to lie under oath about it - that she was not trying to kill the cop - that she picked up the gun because she was panicked, and it went off, scaring her as much as everyone else.  Third, she&#039;s a recent rape victim, which makes her hugely sympathetic and gives her panic a reason, making it likely that she wouldn&#039;t be prosecuted, and if prosecuted wouldn&#039;t be convicted.  This whole plot point falls apart entirely.

(2) When the cop commits suicide, the blackmail threat against Mortimer and Ejiofor - that they&#039;ll be charged with bribery and attempted murder and whatever - evaporates. You can&#039;t prosecute them if the main prosecution witness is dead. So the premise of the latter half of the movie - that Ejiofor must fight because there&#039;s no alternative - is ridiculous and empty.  Mortimer would certainly know this.

So I&#039;m not sure why you think the plot was so tight.  Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keith &#8211; this is quite a long time after you wrote the post, but I hope you&#8217;ll respond.</p>
<p>&#8211;&gt; &#8220;with only a few tiny oversights&#8221; &lt;&#8211;</p>
<p>Really?  I mean it &#8211; I&#8217;m not trolling here.  Here are the two main oversights that are really not tiny.</p>
<p>(1) The idea that the cop could have arrested Emily Mortimer for &#8220;attempted murder&#8221; &#8211; that&#8217;s just idiotic. First, as a cop he left a loaded gun out on a countertop &#8211; you think he&#8217;s not getting in trouble if he reports that? YOu think he doesn&#8217;t risk a suspension?  Second, it was obvious to everyone &#8211; including Ejiofor&#8217;s character, who was not about to lie under oath about it &#8211; that she was not trying to kill the cop &#8211; that she picked up the gun because she was panicked, and it went off, scaring her as much as everyone else.  Third, she&#8217;s a recent rape victim, which makes her hugely sympathetic and gives her panic a reason, making it likely that she wouldn&#8217;t be prosecuted, and if prosecuted wouldn&#8217;t be convicted.  This whole plot point falls apart entirely.</p>
<p>(2) When the cop commits suicide, the blackmail threat against Mortimer and Ejiofor &#8211; that they&#8217;ll be charged with bribery and attempted murder and whatever &#8211; evaporates. You can&#8217;t prosecute them if the main prosecution witness is dead. So the premise of the latter half of the movie &#8211; that Ejiofor must fight because there&#8217;s no alternative &#8211; is ridiculous and empty.  Mortimer would certainly know this.</p>
<p>So I&#8217;m not sure why you think the plot was so tight.  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
