Who’s to Blame for the Tabloidization of Journalism? Not Elizabeth Taylor

Elizabeth TaylorFrom Elizabeth Taylor in the 1950s to just about everyone and everything else in the 2010s: The tabloidization of journalism

[See previous post: "Janet Gaynor and Charles Farrell: Studio-Manufactured Love Affairs."] Despite the sensational coverage of Roscoe ’Fatty’ Arbuckle’s rape/manslaughter trial and of the (still unsolved) murder of director William Desmond Taylor in the early ’20s, the tabloidization of entertainment news would go mainstream only in the ’50s, probably as a consequence of the decline of the Studio Era — at its height from the mid-’20s to the early ’50s — and the emergence of Confidential magazine and its imitators. (Note: Ingrid Bergman didn’t have a studio to back her up in the late ’40s, when she became a Hollywood pariah following an extra-marital affair with Roberto Rossellini.) [Photo: Elizabeth Taylor.]

The precursor of today’s vicious online and supermarket gossip rags, Confidential mockingly implied that Liberace was gay, insinuated that hunk Tab Hunter and sultry Lizabeth Scott were also gay (Scott sued), and revealed sexual encounters (whether true or made up) involving the likes of Maureen O’Hara and Dorothy Dandridge (both O’Hara and Dandridge also sued). [See also: "Sex Scandals and Politics at the Movies."]

Elizabeth Taylor: Tabloid fodder

In the late ’50s, gossip rags kept their writers and their readers busy with the Debbie Reynolds / Eddie Fisher / Elizabeth Taylor triangle, which in the early ’60s evolved into the Eddie Fisher / Elizabeth Taylor / Richard Burton / Sybil Burton quadrangle. Since then, tabloids (and the paparazzi, named after a photographer / celebrity parasite found in Federico Fellini’s La Dolce Vita) have become a media fixture.

In fact, whether on television, online, or (in the past) in print, the tabloids have been as good as — at times better than — the Old Hollywood studios at manufacturing and perpetuating the celebrity of pop stars. Don’t fool yourself, Elizabeth Taylor’s lasting fame has less to do with A Place in the Sun; Giant; Suddenly Last Summer; or her Oscar-winning star turn in Mike NicholsWho’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf? than with the scandal-boosted Cleopatra — the biggest blockbuster of 1963 — and the ensuing tabloid attention that helped to fuel global interest in the Elizabeth Taylor-Richard Burton movie pairings of the ’60s and that throughout the decades have kept Taylor in the dementia-prone public’s consciousness. (See also: "Hollywood Scandals: Ingrid Bergman / Elizabeth Taylor / Lana Turner.")

Who’s to blame?

Certainly not Elizabeth Taylor. Some have blamed media producers and/or the big conglomerates that control them for the near-total tabloidization of entertainment journalism — or rather, of journalism, period. Personally, I find that both unfair and dishonest.

If most news today consists of tabloidized, sensational, dishonest reporting, that’s merely because most people today want to be fed that sort of shit. If the (vast) majority of news consumers the world over weren’t shiteaters, shit purveyors would go out of business. See, it’s all about market forces — and a large dose of hypocrisy — at work.

Continue Reading: Arnold Schwarzenegger THE LAST STAND: Worst Box-Office Bomb in Schwarzenegger’s Career?

Previous Post: Janet Gaynor and Charles Farrell: Studio Manufactured Affairs

"Who’s to Blame for the Tabloidization of Journalism? Not Elizabeth Taylor" © 2004-2013 Alt Film Guide and/or author(s). "Who’s to Blame for the Tabloidization of Journalism? Not Elizabeth Taylor" text NOT to be reproduced without prior written consent.

From around the web:

You can post your comment about "Who’s to Blame for the Tabloidization of Journalism? Not Elizabeth Taylor" in the space below. Note: Different views and opinions are perfectly fine, but courtesy is imperative. Abusive, trollish, and inflammatory comments and/or remarks will be deleted, and such commenters may be banned.

Leave a Comment

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

1 Comment to Elizabeth Taylor Not to Blame: The Tabloidization of Journalism

  1. Ann

    Elizabeth Taylor was a fabulous star and she would be remembered today even without the help of the tabloid, I’m sure of it. Who can forget her in “National Velvet,” a wonderful family-friendly movie that she did when she was in her teens? Who can forget how beautiful she was in that great Drama “A Place in the Sun”? No tabloid could have made her a star. Elizabeth Taylor became a star because she had talent and charisma, unlike today’s actresses who don’t have anything but publicists and scandals. They’ll be forgotten in no time. Elizabeth Taylor will be remembered forever as one of the greatest women of the 20th century.

Top Ten Film Villains
CASABLANCA Review Pt.2 - Paul Henreid
Oscar 2010: Oscar Night America Parties
Robert Pattinson, AVATAR, STAR TREK: Empire Awards...
Linda Christian Dead at 87: Tyrone Power's Second ...
Noah's Ark Flood and the Bride of Frankenstein: Ho...