<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sylvester Stallone’s THE EXPENDABLES Tops, Julia Roberts’ EAT PRAY LOVE No. 2, SCOTT PILGRIM Disappoints: Early Weekend Box Office Estimates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.altfg.com/blog/movie/the-expendables-eat-pray-love-no-2-scott-pilgrim-weekend-box-office-estimates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.altfg.com/blog/movie/the-expendables-eat-pray-love-no-2-scott-pilgrim-weekend-box-office-estimates/</link>
	<description>The Oscars, film awards, new releases, Los Angeles screenings, movie classics, gay movies, film festivals, box office, foreign and independent films</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 23:31:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: zac</title>
		<link>http://www.altfg.com/blog/movie/the-expendables-eat-pray-love-no-2-scott-pilgrim-weekend-box-office-estimates/#comment-492180</link>
		<dc:creator>zac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 00:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.altfg.com/blog/?p=24971#comment-492180</guid>
		<description>Ben,

You make several very valid points. Thanks for writing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben,</p>
<p>You make several very valid points. Thanks for writing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.altfg.com/blog/movie/the-expendables-eat-pray-love-no-2-scott-pilgrim-weekend-box-office-estimates/#comment-492177</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 14:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.altfg.com/blog/?p=24971#comment-492177</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s funny you compare Scott Pilgrim to Charlie St. Cloud.  They scored about the same box office but doesn&#039;t it show actually why Zac Efron is much more of a star than people are giving him credit for.  

Scott Pilgrim had a large advertising campaign with promotion building for 15 months, it had a large cast behind the star Michael Cera who could promote it, and it had great reviews.  

Charlie St. Cloud had terrible advertising that started only 11 weeks before the film came out, Zac Efron was the only one pushing it, and it had terrible reviews.  

There were many reasons for people to turn up to Scott Pilgrim.  Where as Zac Efron&#039;s the only reason people turned up to Charlie St. Cloud and he did equal business.

It is unfortunate for Scott Pilgrim and for Zac Efron.  Both deserved better than Universal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s funny you compare Scott Pilgrim to Charlie St. Cloud.  They scored about the same box office but doesn&#8217;t it show actually why Zac Efron is much more of a star than people are giving him credit for.  </p>
<p>Scott Pilgrim had a large advertising campaign with promotion building for 15 months, it had a large cast behind the star Michael Cera who could promote it, and it had great reviews.  </p>
<p>Charlie St. Cloud had terrible advertising that started only 11 weeks before the film came out, Zac Efron was the only one pushing it, and it had terrible reviews.  </p>
<p>There were many reasons for people to turn up to Scott Pilgrim.  Where as Zac Efron&#8217;s the only reason people turned up to Charlie St. Cloud and he did equal business.</p>
<p>It is unfortunate for Scott Pilgrim and for Zac Efron.  Both deserved better than Universal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

