***We're looking for contributors***

Disney's Rights to Mickey Mouse Questioned

Mickey Mouse in Steamboat WillieMickey Mouse in the public domain? Disney's rights to the 1928 Mickey questioned (Image: Mickey Mouse in Steamboat Willie)

Mickey Mouse belongs to Walt Disney Enterprises. Back in the late '90s, when Bill Clinton was president of the United States, they made sure that the U.S. congress extended copyright protections – from 75 to 95 years: the Copyright Term Extension Act a.k.a. “The Mickey Mouse Protection Act.”

And when those copyrights are about to expire, Disney will quite possibly take up the fight once again to extend them for all eternity and beyond – minus a day (or a minute), so as not to go against the U.S. Constitution. Or at least for another quarter of a century. And then for another quarter. And so on. If that happens, the U.S. congress will in all probability do as they're told, to hell with freedom to create new works out of old ones. After all, there's money involved. Lots of it.

'The Mickey Mouse Protection Act'

Ironically, despite Disney's arduous efforts, there may be a loophole in The Mickey Mouse Protection Act. As Joseph Menn explains in the Los Angeles Times:

“Brand experts reckon his value to today's Walt Disney Co. empire at more than $3 billion. Acts of Congress have extended Mickey's copyright so long that they provoked a Supreme Court challenge, making Mickey the ultimate symbol of intellectual property.

“All signs pointed to a Hollywood ending with Disney and Mickey Mouse living happily ever after – at least until a grumpy former employee looked closely at fine print long forgotten in company archives.

“Film credits from the 1920s revealed imprecision in copyright claims that some experts say could invalidate Disney's long-held copyright, though a Disney lawyer dismissed that idea as 'frivolous.'"

“Although studio executives are not yet hurling themselves from the parapets of Sleeping Beauty's castle, the unexpected discovery raises an intriguing question: Is it possible that Mickey Mouse now belongs to the world – and that his likeness is usable by anybody for anything?"

The Mickey Mouse in question is the one found in the 1928 short Steamboat Willie. That particular Mickey would be the one supposedly in the public domain.

Now, will the all-powerful Disney conglomerate allow anyone to touch their cherished (and immensely profitable) icon, whether or not its copyright has officially expired? Go on dreaming.

         
Disney's Rights to Mickey Mouse Questioned © 2004–2018 Alt Film Guide and/or author(s).
Text NOT to be reproduced without prior written consent.

Leave a comment about 'Disney's Rights to Mickey Mouse Questioned'

COMMENTING RULES:

Don't waste time and energy disagreeing with and/or being deeply offended by the presentation of factual information.

On the other hand, it's perfectly okay to disagree with and/or, if you're so inclined, to be deeply offended by the views & opinions (and/or likes & dislikes) found on this site. And to let us know about any omissions or, heaven forbid, errors.

Just bear in mind that *thoughtfulness* and *at least a modicum of sanity* are imperative.

In other words: Feel free to add something reasonable & coherent – AND fact-based – to the discussion.

Abusive/bigoted, trollish/inflammatory, baseless (spreading misinformation, whether intentionally or not), spammy, and/or just plain deranged comments will be zapped and offenders may be banned.

And finally, links found in comments will generally be deleted.

Most recent comments listed on top.

2 Comments to Disney's Rights to Mickey Mouse Questioned

  1. Guest

    Why is it that so many people think that if they can't take  something from the public domain - NOTHING else will ever get created? It is only the expression of the idea that cannot be copied. Not the idea. So instead of relying off someone else's work -why not just create work of your  own? Add to the world of creativity instead of using it.

  2. Joey McDermott

    For a useful analysis of the widespread problem of claiming copyright on public domain works, see Jason Mazzone's article, “Copyfraud,” published by New York University. It is available for (free) download here: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=787244