***We're looking for contributors***

Tom Hanks CLOUD ATLAS Box Office: One of Hanks' Worst Opening Weekends Ever

Tom Hanks Cloud AtlasTom Hanks Cloud Atlas box office: One of Hanks' weakest (wide-release) debuts ever

Featuring Academy Award winners Tom Hanks, Halle Berry, Susan Sarandon, and Jim Broadbent (plus Hugh Grant), and directed by The Matrix's Andy Wachowski, Lana Wachowski, and Perfume: The Story of a Murderer's Tom Tykwer, Cloud Atlas opened below expectations in North America this pre-Halloween weekend, Oct. 26-28. (Image: Tom Hanks Cloud Atlas.)

Looking at Friday grosses, Cloud Atlas seemed poised to take in somewhere between $11-12 million. However, according to Warner Bros. estimates reported at Box Office Mojo, by Sunday night the time-bending, mind-bending drama will have collected a meager $9.4 million at 2,008 locations (including 105 IMAX screens), averaging only $4,681 per theater. If studio estimates are accurate, Cloud Atlas will be trailing not only Ben Affleck's political thriller Argo (with a less-than-expected $12.35 million, down 25 percent from last weekend), but also Sony Pictures' Hotel Transylvania ($9.5m).

Why did Cloud Atlas underperform?

Why did Cloud Atlas underperform? Well, one could blame everything from Hurricane Sandy and Frankenstorm to Halloween costume parties and the just-as-circus-like U.S. presidential election. But chances are that the real culprit was not bad weather or Mitt Romney, but weak word of mouth for a movie with a disjointed plotline – if it can be called that.

For instance, Cloud Atlas, which has a mediocre C+ CinemaScore, was up only (an estimated) 9 percent on Saturday. For comparison's sake: Argo was up 35 percent while Liam Neeson's critically lambasted thriller Taken 2 was up 33 percent. Even Tyler Perry's box office bomb Alex Cross was up 37 percent on Saturday. In fact, only two movies had worse Friday-to-Saturday percentage increases (or decrease) than Cloud Atlas: new entries Silent Hill: Revelation 3D (down 23 percent) and Chasing Mavericks (the Gerard Butler bomb was up a minuscule 4 percent).

Cloud Atlas' originally estimated $12 million first-weekend take wouldn't have been bad at all for something as unusual as the Tykwer / Wachowski Starship effort. But once again, if studio estimates are correct, $9.4 million is an undeniably poor North American start for a movie that cost a reported $102 million (not including marketing / distribution expenses).

On the positive side, on its first weekend out Cloud Atlas grossed nearly as much as Darren Aronofsky / Hugh Jackman / Rachel Weisz's similarly framed The Fountain, which brought in $10.14 million ($12.4 million adjusted for inflation) during its entire run in 2006. Having said that, since Cloud Atlas could theoretically end its domestic run with less than $20m, its only chance of at least matching its production budget at the box office is the international market. In the coming months, the Tykwer / Wachowski Starship movie is going to be slowly rolled out around the world.

Playing it safe, Warner Bros. acquired the domestic rights to the independently financed Cloud Atlas for a reported $15 million. Focus Features International will handle (at least some) foreign territories.

Cloud Atlas: One of Tom Hanks' worst opening-weekend box office performers

Cloud Atlas has scored one of Tom Hanks' weakest (wide-release) first-weekend grosses (adjusted for inflation) since the beginning of his movie career in the early '80s. If studio estimates are accurate, Cloud Atlas trailed not only the Hanks / Julia Roberts summer 2011 flop Larry Crowne's $13.09 million, but also the modest performer Charlie Wilson's War ($9.65m). In fact, one has to go back all the way to 1990's The Bonfire of the Vanities' ($4.21 million, or approx. $8 million adjusted) to find a weaker Tom Hanks wide-release debut.

The only two other Tom Hanks movies to suffer lower opening-weekend grosses than Cloud Atlas in the last (almost) three decades are the family drama Nothing in Common (1986, approx. $7 million adjusted) and the poorly received comedy remake The Man with One Red Shoe (1985, approx. $7 million adjusted). True, both had shorter running times (and more daily showings) than Cloud Atlas; however, both were screened at about 1,000 fewer locations as well. (The number of available seats – movie-theater sizes have changed dramatically in the last thirty years – is, of course, unknown.)

Cloud Atlas currently has a mediocre 40 percent approval rating and 6/10 average among Rotten Tomatoes' top critics.

Note: Considering that Cloud Atlas was only $100,000 behind Hotel Transylvania, it's possible that the two movies may have their placements on the domestic box office chart switched around when weekend actuals are released on Monday.

Tom Hanks Cloud Atlas image: Warner Bros.

If you liked the article Tom Hanks CLOUD ATLAS Box Office: One of Hanks' Worst Opening Weekends Ever, please recommend it to your friends. See floating share buttons on the left.
Follow Alt Film Guide on Google+, Facebook, and Twitter.
Tom Hanks CLOUD ATLAS Box Office: One of Hanks' Worst Opening Weekends Ever © 2004-2016 Alt Film Guide and/or author(s).
Text NOT to be reproduced without prior written consent.

Continue Reading: Lon McCallister Bio: Handsome 1940s Fox Juvenile Lead

Previous Post: CLOUD ATLAS Box Office: One of Tom Hanks' Weakest Debuts Ever

Leave a comment about 'Tom Hanks CLOUD ATLAS Box Office: One of Hanks' Worst Opening Weekends Ever'

Important: Different views and opinions are perfectly fine, but courtesy, respect, thoughtfulness, and at least a modicum of sanity are imperative.

In other words: Rude/abusive, bigoted, baseless (spreading misinformation), trollish/inflammatory, and/or just plain deranged comments will be zapped and offenders may be banned.

Most recent comments listed on top.

6 Comments to Tom Hanks CLOUD ATLAS Box Office: One of Hanks' Worst Opening Weekends Ever

  1. Kristine

    Certain one of the worst movie I have seen in a long long time. Sorry badly strung together and plots kept jumping around like a uber short attention kid's head on steroid, nothing can save this movie from falling off the cliff into the deep abyss. Don't expect your audience to get it if you are not trying to tell a story clearly. The producer is clearly trying hard to make this production look smart and sophisticate with nonlinear plots. The subtext of karma and reincarnation is presented here very weakly. Saw people left the theater walking out in disgust. Luckily I only paid 2 dollars for this shameful production……

  2. Matt

    This is definitely a love-it or hate-it film and the only way to tell is to see it for yourself. Personally, I loved the movie. It's beautiful, it's life-affirming. I found the acting, writing, music, cinematography, and effects all to be fantastic. Even if it is a flop at the box office it will be a movie with a strong and loyal following for years to come and will still be remembered and discussed long after many of this year's biggest hits are forgotten.

  3. bea

    I saw the movie and I like it. `However its one of those movie where you have to know what its about. If you don't, you wont get it. And you wont like it. I would like to see it again with a list infront of me of all the stars and the characters they played. Too figure out the thread from which they were. It was a film I actually thought about afterwards. Most films i dont think about.

  4. jacob warber

    This movie was horrible, I don't care what part of the world your in- this movie is awful. Was hoping for something awesome, but nothing happened. Very boring and way too long. I've never seen a theater audience walk out of a film and look so disappointed.

  5. Natalie

    I loved Cloud Atlas! I thought all the actors & actresses gave an outstanding performance!! It's amazing to me how one person can be so many people, that are so different in one movie! It's very disappointing how it did at the box office, but I don't think that's an accurate representation of how great everyone did & how good the movie is as a whole! Ill definitely pay to see it at least one more time!

  6. Benny

    I wish Tom Hanks had not been involved in this film. Worst $20 I have ever spent at the movies.