Alt Film Guide
Classic movies. Gay movies. International cinema. Socially conscious & political cinema.
Home Movie Reviews Ender’s Game (2013) Movie Review: Self-Serious Superficiality in Dystopian Gavin Hood Actioner

Ender’s Game (2013) Movie Review: Self-Serious Superficiality in Dystopian Gavin Hood Actioner

Ender’s Game movie Asa ButterfieldEnder’s Game movie with Asa Butterfield. Budgeted at a reported $110 million (not including marketing and distribution costs), Ender’s Game raked in a disastrous $125.4 million worldwide.
  • Ender’s Game (2013) movie review: Despite its self-important seriousness, Gavin Hood’s costly dystopian actioner barely takes the trouble to scratch its violent, disturbing surface.

Ender’s Game movie review: Gavin Hood’s self-serious sci-fier fails to explore the ugly brutality & child abuse at its core

Orson Scott Card’s sci-fi novel Ender’s Game was published in 1985, and in the 28 years that elapsed before the book became a film, the idea of children trained to fight by orders of an unfeeling government has been repeatedly co-opted, most notably by a certain tale of a beautiful young archer named Katniss.

Indeed, comparisons between Ender’s Game and The Hunger Games are inevitable, but the key similarity between the two is that neither film really explores or, in the case of The Hunger Games, even acknowledges the disturbing brutality that lies at the core of their intricately constructed worlds.

To its credit, Ender’s Game – under the clean, straightforward direction of Gavin Hood (one of the X-Men movies, it’s hard to keep track) – does have a bracing, steel-grey self-seriousness and an interest in the psychology of what it takes to be a leader. And in the future depicted here, Earth can use all the self-serious leaders it can get.

Warring Christ figure

The action, which Hood adapted from Card’s book, takes place 50 years after our planet repelled an invasion by an insect-like alien race called the Formics. The militaristic government has since begun recruiting youngsters to train for Round Two which, according to one of the many information-bearing monitors that constitute much of Ender’s Game gorgeous production design, gets as close as 28 days away.

Initially, Ender Wiggins may not look like anyone’s idea of a fighter and, as embodied by a rather blank Asa Butterfield (Martin Scorsese’s Hugo), he’s not even particularly likable. He’s scrawny, red-eyed, and has the disadvantage of being the third child born in a society that limits parents to two children. And yet, like other sci-fi Christ figures, his destiny is about to change.

In the passages of Gavin Hood’s adaptation that click, Ender provides sharp, clear reasoning as to why he has the psychological make-up of a potential leader. At school, he pummels a bully because he “wanted to win that fight, and all the fights after that.” In another instance, Ender defuses conflict using shrewd rhetoric that avoids any use of violence.

These attributes attract the interest of the government, represented by single-minded, cold-hearted Col. Graff (Harrison Ford in his best basso profondo) and Major Anderson (Viola Davis), the only one who even hints at what’s ultimately being asked of these children. They agree to send Ender to an orbiting Battle School where teams of young “launchies” (including an underused Hailee Steinfeld) compete to weed out the strong from the weak.

Ender’s Game movie Harrison FordEnder’s Game movie with Harrison Ford.

‘Kid empowerment’ Hollywood style

The cruelty of fighting forces comprised of gung-ho kids too green to understand what they’re getting into is not an idea you’ll see examined here. Instead, much of this will be ingested as fairly typical kid-empowerment stuff about finding your destiny and becoming so respected and valued by adults that they’re compelled to salute you.

All that is mixed in with a whole heap of war simulations that become awfully repetitive and prove no substitute for the forward momentum that only real dramatic conflict can provide. If Gavin Hood felt pressure to deliver on a potential franchise by appeasing the iPad generation with training scenes and videogame sessions, that’s a pity, no matter how polished those sequences might be.

Mercenary motives could also explain why Hood pays scant attention to Ender’s family, including his cruel and jealous brother (Jimmy Jax Pinchak) and his protective sister (Abigail Breslin). Had these relationships been explored, Ender might have been a character worth some emotional investment and not just a cypher climbing the ranks of command while facing increasingly difficult tests meant to challenge and harden him.

These tests culminate in Ender’s final evaluation, a simulated attack on the Formics’ staging planet. Success would cement his status as Mankind’s replacement savior for the legendary Mazer Rackham (Ben Kingsley, still deciding if he’s a B-movie hack or a prestige actor), who had saved the world during the first Formic invasion.

As complex as studio executives allow

Ender’s performance during the attack, where he stands behind a podium like an orchestra conductor, balletically moving his arms and barking orders, is a freak show of laser blasts, flying ships, and deep, yawning sounds (including those of composer Steve Jablonsky, provider of the terrific, brooding score). It is as engrossing as it is overwrought.

However, its aftermath, whose details are best experienced with no foreknowledge, is the film’s best fusion of action, consequence, and interpersonal conflict, for it allows Ender to take a moral stance – which comes as a shock considering the movie’s otherwise plodding trajectory.

These sequences crystallize the inevitable moment when a young person realizes their elders are flawed and their actions deserve to be questioned. And if their elders’ answers lack credibility by virtue of their flaws, the young individual must find the answers on their own.

It is here, at this sequel-baiting denouement, that we leave Ender Wiggin, a character who becomes most interesting when it’s (almost) too late. Otherwise, given today’s studio environment Ender’s Game is about as good a film as you can squeeze out of a morally complex source. In case you’re wondering, that’s not really a compliment.

Ender’s Game (2013) cast & crew

Director: Gavin Hood.

Screenplay: Gavin Hood.
From Orson Scott Card’s 1985 novel, itself an expansion of Card’s short story of the same name published in the August 1977 issue of Analog Science Fiction and Fact.

Cast: Asa Butterfield, Harrison Ford, Hailee Steinfeld, Abigail Breslin, Viola Davis, Ben Kingsley, Aramis Knight, Suraj Partha (as Suraj Parthasarathy), Moises Arias, Jimmy Jax Pinchak.
Cameo: Gavin Hood (as the Giant).

Cinematography: Donald M. McAlpine.

Film Editing: Zach Staenberg & Leigh Smith (as Lee Smith).

Music: Steve Jablonsky.

Production Design: Sean Haworth & Ben Procter.

Producers: Gigi Pritzker, Linda McDonough, Alex Kurtzman, Roberto Orci, Robert Chartoff, Lynn Hendee, Orson Scott Card, and Ed Ulbrich.

Production Companies: Digital Domain 3.0 | Oddlot Entertainment | K/O Paper Products.

Distributor: Summit Entertainment.

Running Time: 114 min.

Country: United States.


Ender’s Game (2013) Movie Review” endnotes

Ender’s Game movie box office information via boxofficemojo.com.

The 1985 novel Ender’s Game was the first in a series of about a dozen titles, most recently Earth Afire (2013).

The Gavin Hood-directed X-Men movie mentioned in the review text is X-Men Origins: Wolverine. Hood is also the director of the 2005 South African drama and Best Foreign Language Film Academy Award winner Tsotsi.

Ender’s Game movie credits via the American Film Institute (AFI) website.

Asa Butterfield and Harrison Ford Ender’s Game movie images: Summit Entertainment | Lionsgate.

Ender’s Game (2013) Movie Review: Self-Serious Superficiality in Dystopian Gavin Hood Actioner” last updated in September 2022.

Recommended for You

Leave a Comment

*IMPORTANT*: By using this form you agree with Alt Film Guide's storage and handling of your data (e.g., your IP address). Make sure your comment adds something relevant to the discussion: Feel free to disagree with us and write your own movie commentaries, but *thoughtfulness* and *at least a modicum of sanity* are imperative. Abusive, inflammatory, spammy/self-promotional, baseless (spreading mis- or disinformation), and just plain deranged comments will be zapped. Lastly, links found in submitted comments will generally be deleted.

5 comments

The Separator -

After a summer filled with awesome sci-fi the bar was set high. Gavin Hood’s production of Ender didn’t even come close to reaching that bar. I think it was a waste of the admission price.

Reply
didi -

These BO numbers are good but indeed not extraordinary. It follows the trend of this year: new franchises (most for young adults) don’t exceed the expectations or, more blantly, disappoint, proving that it isn’t that easy to create a success story.
It was to be expected that The Hunger Games would be successful (more in the States than outside) because they’re ment for males and females, like Harry Potter was too.
But the success of Twilight (more international than in the States), a franchise appealing only to a female audience becomes more and more historical. While the media and critics treated the movies and the audience in a very condescending way, it now shows that you don’t create a phenomenom on demand. It is there, or it isn’t. Even THG franchise doesn’t succeed to remain into the spotlights on a continue base as the Saga did.
I hope this will result into more respect for the Twilight leads. More actors could’ve played Edward, maybe, but only one made Edward the most beloved movie character worldwide and created the immense hype.

Reply
Kappa -

This book IS impossible to film, most of the emotional/meaningful moments with Ender take place in his head, so unless they planned on doing voiceover, this was never going to be as in-depth as the book.

Reply
Kelly -

I’ve heard a lot about how Card won’t make any money off this movie. That doesn’t bother me anymore.

Reply
Just Some Guy -

Well, it sounds like they preserved the big reveal of the story after all. All the promos had be thinking they’d Hollywood’d it completely to death. Sounds like they stayed true to the book - which was a stretch on the original short story, btw, if you’re wondering where the repetition came from.

Reply

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. If you continue browsing, that means you've accepted our Terms of Use/use of cookies. You may also click on the Accept button on the right to make this notice disappear. Accept Read More