Alt Film Guide
Classic movies. Gay movies. International cinema. Socially conscious & political cinema.
Home Film ArticlesMovie Reviews The Sadist (Movie 1963): Chillingly Great Bad Movie

The Sadist (Movie 1963): Chillingly Great Bad Movie

The Sadist Arch Hall Jr
The Sadist with Arch Hall Jr.
  • The Sadist (movie 1963) review.

The Sadist (movie 1963) review: Curious B flick

Ramon Novarro biography Beyond Paradise

Say what you will about Arch Hall Jr. (and I know many people have), but he gives an outstanding performance in James Landis’ The Sadist – one that is quite unlike his amateurish appearance opposite his father in Eegah, only a year earlier. In fact, Hall Jr.’s chilling portrayal of a psychotic, gun-toting, homicidal maniac is what makes this “bad” movie so “good.”

Before the credits are displayed, we see a close-up on his eyes, with the following narration (by Arch Hall, Sr.):

“I have been hurt by others. And I will hurt them. I will make them suffer like they have made me suffer.”

Three treacly sweet school teachers are on their way to a ball game when their car stalls in a junkyard behind an abandoned gas station. Not only are there no other signs of life, but two dead bodies are inside the backhouse, still seated at a table where their last meal was served. Yes. Something is definitely wrong.

From out of the wrecked cars come a young pistol-wielding man (Arch Hall, Jr.) and his mentally deficient girlfriend (Marilyn Manning). For the next 90 real-time minutes, we are treated to one act of brutal violence after another.

Hall Jr’s Charlie Tibbs is a creepy, baby-faced killer who taunts his victims one at a time. The oldest teacher (Don Russell) is a family man with two children the killer’s age. As he pleads for his life, the man gets on his knees and talks to the maniac like he would with his own son. That was the wrong thing to do: Hall not only hates teachers, he hates fathers too. The other two victims, muscle-bound Richard Alden and a pretty blonde Helen Hovey, helplessly watch in horror as Tibbs and his partner viciously humiliate them.

Cold-blooded deaths

Following a couple more cold-blooded deaths, the two psychos leisurely enjoy eating the food from the dead family’s house while the hostages whisper to each other about how they could possibly escape. They know they’re next.

What sets The Sadist apart is the film’s realism. Unlike other low-budget, crazed-killer movies, James Landis’ effort is as volatile and unpredictable as the maniac with the gun, one that builds suspense to a bloody crescendo. The viewer can thus empathize with the two victims, thinking of ways to escape right along with them. Never mind the fact that in real life we know they would both surely end up dead.

At one point, Hovey gets away – but since this is 1963, she is wearing a tight skirt with a matching frilly blouse and high heels. She goes running through the desert landscape, limping and falling all the way. In desperation, she kicks her shoes off and runs barefoot. We see the cuts and bruises on her feet and the snags in her nylons.

The entire drama is played outside, under a blazing hot California sun, which makes the characters’ predicament all the more unbearable and oppressive. One great touch of atmosphere is that during a crucial, tragic moment a car radio plays in the background. The station happens to be set to the ball game that those three poor, miserable school teachers had missed.

Whether because of James Landis’ direction and screenplay, or the harshly lit cinematography by Close Encounters of the Third Kind‘s Vilmos Zsigmond (here billed as William Zsigmond), The Sadist is a powerful “cult” movie – one that fully deserved a wider release at the time. In fact, The Sadist always frightens me; so much so, I have a hard time classifying it as a “bad” movie at all.

© Danny Fortune

The Sadist (movie 1963) cast & crew

Direction & Screenplay: James Landis.

Cast: Arch Hall Jr. Richard Alden. Marilyn Manning. Don Russell. Helen Hovey.

Leave a Comment

*IMPORTANT*: By using this form you agree with Alt Film Guide's storage and handling of your data (e.g., your IP address). Make sure your comment adds something relevant to the discussion: Feel free to disagree with us and write your own movie commentaries, but *thoughtfulness* and *at least a modicum of sanity* are imperative. Abusive, inflammatory, spammy/self-promotional, baseless (spreading mis- or disinformation), and just plain deranged comments will be zapped. Lastly, links found in submitted comments will generally be deleted.


Dusty McGowan -

This is a literally “hot off the presses” comment. I just finished watching “The Sadist” for the first time mere minutes ago. And here is where my expectations were tweaked. There is nothing laughable or campy about it; the desperation on display is far too real. I was very affected by the moments of silence (particularly during the long chase at the end). I would say this is another case of a film being labeled “B” by mere circumstance (lack of exposure, recognizable actors, and better distribution).

Darryl Banton -

This was most recently broadcast on July 28, 2013 on “TCM Underground.” Like Mr. Fortune and Mr. Moody, I agree that this is a well done effort, which deserves future viewings. Looking at it from an historical perspective, the premise of the film is as timely today as it was in 1963, in light of recent news headlines.

What was most disturbing and thought provoking, in watching “The Sadist” is that the the film works because the plot and storyline are quite streamlined, and this is what makes the film work. It is not a “who-done-it investigation,” rather the profile of a psychopathic criminal. Arch Hall, Jr. is effective in portraying evil personified, with his baby-faced looks and turn-on-a dime personality. The viewer constantly feels that he or she needs to be on their guard when Hall’s character is not on the screen.

This is a film that deserves a wider audience, if only to point out its place in the crime drama genre. Many will note that there are a great many things here in the way of writing, action, and levels of violence that are also common to the current slate of television crime and police procedurals.

Carter Moody -

Danny Fortune is right that this 1963 low-budget, black-and-white film is so well done (performances, direction, photography) that I can imagine it being studied by Martin Scorsese, Francis Ford Coppola, or Peter Fonda, coming into their own in that decade. The camera’s slow, predatory pacing among the broken down cars and trucks, lying in the sun like so many corpses, mimics every step of Charlie Tibbs. The underpaid teachers hoping to see a Dodgers/Reds game in LA are anathema to him and his idiot, soda-guzzling girlfriend. Baking sun, dry California underbrush and the stark shadows cast by old cars and machinery play across the screen. I empathize with and envy those who will take on this movie, perhaps in Turner Classic Movies in OnDemand or through some other venue. It is chilling, and yet you’ll appreciate the dark art this slim crew and writer/director James Landis pulled off.


This website uses cookies to improve your experience. If you continue browsing, that means you've accepted our Terms of Use/use of cookies. You may also click on the Accept button on the right to make this notice disappear. Accept Read More