Alt Film Guide


Classic movies
Gay movies
International cinema
Socially conscious cinema



Follow us:

threads.com/@altfilmguide
@altfilmguide.bsky.social/
https://mstdn.social/@altfilmguide
https://mastodon.social/@altfgclassics
Home Box OfficeThe Tree of Life Box Office: Year’s Second-Highest Average

The Tree of Life Box Office: Year’s Second-Highest Average

The Tree of Life Brad PittThe Tree of Life movie with Brad Pitt: Terrence Malick’s latest had a strong debut in limited release in the domestic market, but it’s unclear whether that’s an indicator that the $32 million “arthouse” production will earn a profit at the box office.

Ramon Novarro Beyond Paradise
  • The Tree of Life box office: A Fox Searchlight release, Terrence Malick’s first feature since The New World had the year’s second-highest per-theater average after opening at four locations in Los Angeles and New York City. Brad Pitt, Sean Penn, and Jessica Chastain star in the Palme d’Or winner.

The Tree of Life box office: Starring Brad Pitt and Sean Penn, Terrence Malick’s drama has year’s second-highest average

May 27–30 (Memorial Day) weekend box office (cont.): At no. 15 on the North American (U.S. and Canada only) chart, Terrence Malick’s Palme d’Or-winning psychological/existential family drama The Tree of Life raked in $493,800 from four Los Angeles and New York locations over the four-day Memorial Day weekend ($372,900 Fri.–Sun.) according to final studio figures found at boxofficemojo.com.

Starring Brad Pitt, Sean Penn, and Jessica Chastain, the Fox Searchlight release had the second-highest (three-day) per-theater average of 2011: $93,230, thus trailing only Woody Allen’s Midnight in Paris, which averaged $99,833 at six theaters the previous (non-holiday) weekend.

Additionally, The Tree of Life boasts the biggest ever opening-weekend average for a Fox Searchlight title, surpassing Black Swan’s $80,212 last December.

Having said that, let’s not forget that Darren Aronofsky’s psychological thriller starring Natalie Portman opened at 18 theaters. All things being equal, the fewer the number of theaters the higher the per-theater average should be. (Note: The Tree of Life’s running time is 35 minutes longer than Black Swan’s; that potentially means fewer screenings per day.)

The Tree of Life vs. previous Terrence Malick movies

Here’s a brief comparison (not adjusted for inflation) between The Tree of Life and Terrence Malick’s two most recent films:

  • Featuring Jim Caviezel and an all-star supporting cast (George Clooney, John Cusack, Sean Penn, etc.), the World War II drama The Thin Red Line averaged an impressive $56,506 (approx. $94,500 today) at five locations in late December 1998. The eventual Best Picture Oscar nominee went on to gross a no-more-than-passable $36.4 million domestically. Worldwide: $98.1 million. Budget: $52 million.
  • Featuring Colin Farrell, Christopher Plummer, and Christian Bale, the historical drama The New World averaged a mere $10,288 at three locations in late December 2005, going on to cume at a paltry $12.7 million domestically. Worldwide total: $30.5 million. Budget: $30 million.

As can be seen above, neither title turned out to be profitable at the (global) box office. In fact, The New World was a downright dud.

Budgeted at a reported $32 million (as always, not including marketing and distribution expenses), The Tree of Life will be expanding to 18 theaters next Friday. It should be playing at 200–300 theaters by early July.

Besides two-time Oscar nominee Brad Pitt (12 Monkeys, 1995; The Curious Case of Benjamin Button, 2008) as a troubled husband and father in a small town in 1950s Texas, Jessica Chastain as his dreamlike wife, and two-time Oscar winner Sean Penn (Mystic River, 2003; Milk, 2008) as their psychologically battered grown son, The Tree of Life also features Tye Sheridan, Hunter McCracken, Laramie Eppler, Kari Matchett, Joanna Going, Michael Showers, and Fiona Shaw.

Surprising international hit – but that wasn’t enough

Update: Despite its lofty start, Terrence Malick’s The Tree of Life ultimately collected a meager $13.3 million domestically and a far better $45.1 million internationally. Worldwide total: $58.4 million.

That’s not a bad global cume for an “arthouse” title. On the downside, it wasn’t nearly enough for the psychological/existential family drama to break even at the box office.

Its top international markets were France ($8.9 million), Japan ($6.2 million), Spain ($4.6 million), Italy ($3.9 million), Germany ($2.9 million), the United Kingdom/Ireland ($2.8 million), Russia/CIS ($2.6 million), Brazil ($1.8 million), and Australia ($1.6 million).


The Tree of Life Box Office: Year’s Second-Highest Average” notes

Also this past Memorial Day weekend, DreamWorks Animation’s sequel Kung Fu Panda 2 was the (disappointing) no. 2 movie in the U.S. and Canada. In the voice cast: Jack Black, Angelina Jolie, and Dustin Hoffman.

Unless otherwise noted, “The Tree of Life Box Office: Year’s Second-Highest Average” box office information via Box Office Mojo. Budget info – which should be taken with a grain of salt – via BOM and/or other sources (e.g., the New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, Screen Daily, The Hollywood Reporter, Variety, Deadline.com, etc.).

Comments about The Tree of Life and other titles being hits/profitable or flops/money-losers at the box office (see paragraph below) are based on the available data about their production budget, additional marketing and distribution expenses (as a general rule of thumb, around 50 percent of the production cost), and worldwide gross (as a general rule of thumb when it comes to the Hollywood studios, around 50–55 percent of the domestic gross and 40 percent of the international gross go to the distributing/producing companies).

Note: Data regarding rebates, domestic and international sales/pre-sales, and other credits and/or contractual details that help to alleviate/split production costs and apportion revenues are oftentimes unavailable, and that reported international grosses may be incomplete (i.e., not every territory is fully – or even partially – accounted for).

Also: Ancillary revenues (domestic/global television rights, home video sales, streaming, merchandising, etc.) can represent anywhere between 40–70 percent of a movie’s total take. However, these revenues and their apportionment are only infrequently made public.

Lastly, although a more accurate reflection of a film’s popularity (i.e., its number of tickets sold), inflation-adjusted estimates should be taken with extreme caution. For instance, they’re based on average domestic ticket prices (via the National Association of Theater Owners, unless otherwise noted) whereas numerous major releases scored a large chunk of their box office take at top-priced venues.


The Tree of Life reviews

Terrence Malick’s 1950s-set family drama The Tree of Life, which stars Brad Pitt, Sean Penn, and Jessica Chastain, was perhaps the most eagerly anticipated film at the 2011 Cannes Film Festival.

It would be inaccurate to say that the enormous amount of interest from cinema aficionados had to do solely with the fact that Malick hasn’t made a movie since The New World back in 2005, or that The Tree of Life had been in gestation for four decades, or that it was shot three years ago and has been in post-production ever since. After all, had Malick been a Polish or Senegalese or Canadian filmmaker – or even a French one, right there, in Cannes – most international film journalists and fans wouldn’t have given a damn even if the concept for the upcoming film had been in the filmmaker’s head for four centuries and the post-production stage had lasted three decades.

And that’s understandable. Chances are they wouldn’t have seen – or even heard of – any of the away-from-Hollywood auteur’s previous film work. They probably wouldn’t have heard of the auteur himself. Malick, however, is Hollywood. A Hollywood maverick, but Hollywood all the same.

The French publication L’Express has published what I believe is the first review of The Tree of Life. The headline of critic Fabrice Leclerc’s piece reads: “A sensorial film, a kaleidoscope of images, Tree of Life is a unique and majestic cinematic experience.”

Leclerc, who compares The Tree of Life to 2001: A Space Odyssey and calls Malick “the spiritual son of Stanley Kubrick,” adds:

A deluge of images, planets, dinosaurs, impersonal skyscrapers, the false sweetness of the family nest: with Tree of Life, Terrence Malick ventures into a narrative experiment and visual delirium that leaves one speechless. His mastery of the craft is near perfect; there’s an idea in each frame and the film is experienced as a long and admirable voyage through creation.

Come awards season, The Tree of Life will undoubtedly find favor with at least some American critics groups. There are so many of them, it would be all but impossible for it not to.

However, considering the fragmented narrative of the film, Best Picture Oscar chances early next year seem iffy. But then again, we now get ten nominees in that category. That could well mean The Tree of Life will be luckier than Kubrick’s 2001 back in 1968.

One more review, from Paris-Match:

“The new Terrence Malick [film] is a metaphysical meditation – on Good and Evil, Nature and Grace – of an incredible formal beauty. If the narrative is at times confusing, frequently going back and forth between the past and the present, memories and visions, the Texan master has created a unique work and probably his most personal film.”


Brad Pitt The Tree of Life image: Fox Searchlight Pictures.

The Tree of Life Box Office: Year’s Second-Highest Average” last modified in October 2023.

Alt Film Guide does not sell your information to third parties. *If you continue browsing, that means you have accepted our Terms of Use/Privacy Policy.* Accept